By Ashley Vice
FITway Alabama Colorectal Cancer Prevention Program
Completing the screening and rescreening cycle for
colorectal cancer is a daunting task for medical practices across the state.
The U.S. Preventative Services Task Force recommends colonoscopy every 10 years
or a flexible sigmoidoscopy every 5 years or an annual stool test for average
risk patients. Identifying patients that
need screening, encouraging compliance with recommended screening methods, and repeating FIT/iFOBT tests annually (when
used as the primary screening option) are just a few of the necessary, but challenging
steps in reducing incidence and mortality of Alabama’s second-leading cancer
killer.
The ideal patient panel for annual screening with FIT/iFOBT
is average risk, compliant and in the provider’s office multiple times per
year. That population exists in Alabama and it has a 30 percent higher risk for
colorectal cancer: people with diabetes (1-2).
One in 10 Alabamians have been diagnosed with diabetes, an
illness that negatively impacts quality of life and lifespan and brings with it
a host of other health issues (3). Those
at risk for type 2 diabetes often mirror those at risk for colorectal cancer:
patients over 50 years old or African Americans, for example. Many of the risk factors for colorectal
cancer also overlap with diabetes including obesity, sedentary lifestyle, and
western diet (1-2, 4).
In addition to sharing risk factors and at-risk populations,
diabetes may also cause or contribute to colorectal cancer through chronic
insulin treatment, increased production of bile acids, and slower bowel transit
(1,4-6).
While data show that diabetic patients in Alabama are more
likely to be screened for CRC than the general population, approximately 29
percent of the diabetic population in Alabama is not up to date on CRC
screening (7).
Tracking screening
within the chronic patient pool:
One way to target diabetic patients and other chronic
disease sufferers for colorectal cancer screening is through electronic health
records (EHR). By choosing colorectal cancer screening as one of your clinical quality
measures (NQF 0034/PQRI 113) you can improve patient care, earn incentives up
to $44,000 for Medicare or $63,750 for Medicaid depending on your patient
population, and achieve three EHR objectives at once.
Providers can achieve the professional core objective by
reporting ambulatory clinical quality measures. Two eligible professional menu
objectives can be achieved by generating a list of patients by specific
condition to use for quality improvement and sending patient reminders as
needed for preventative and follow-up care.
A recent study published in the Annals of Internal Medicine showed that patients completed
recommended screening more often when EHR-linked reminders and fecal occult
blood testing kits were sent to them (9). Primary care facilities in the study
created a registry through EHR which tracked when screening was due and
automatically generated mailings. Patients who received automated reminders and
mailouts were 26.3 percent more likely to be screened even without direct
contact from a nurse or physician. The study also showed drastic increases in
screening rates for patient groups who received automated information and staff
follow-up.
For help setting up clinical decision support rules and
patient alerts for colorectal cancer screening, physicians can contact the
Alabama Regional Extension Center at (251) 414-8170.
Screening more
patients overall:
Screening with a FIT test is a great way to increase
screening in your practice by offering an easier, convenient method of
screening for your patients. Patients offered a choice between colonoscopy and
a stool test are more likely to be screened (8). Patients often have barriers
to colonoscopy like fear and aversion, lack of adequate insurance coverage,
inability to provide transportation or time off from work. Those barriers can
be overcome with take-home stool tests.
Only high-sensitivity tests, like the FIT/iFOBT and
high-sensitivity guaiac are recommended by the USPSTF as acceptable stool
tests. Older, low-sensitivity guaiac
FOBT should no longer be used.
Take-home FIT/iFOBT screening is also covered by major
insurers in Alabama including Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Medicaid, and
Medicare. Medicare reimburses $21.86 for a completed test (CPT Code: G0328QW).
To get more information on screening with the FIT contact
the Alabama Department of Public Health Cancer Prevention Program: Ashley Vice
334-206-3336, ashley.vice@adph.state.al.us
1.
Gioleme O, Diamantidis M, Katsaros M. Is
diabetes a causal agent for colorectal cancer? Pathophysiological and molecular
mechanisms. World Journal of Gasteroenterology 2011, 17, 444-448.
2.
Larsson S, Orsini N, Wolk A. Diabetes Mellitus
and Risk of Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of the National Cancer
Institute 2005, 97, 22.
3.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Diabetes Report Card 2012. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, US Department for Health and Human Services; 2012.
4.
Will J, Galuska D, Vinicor F, Calle E.E.
Colorectal Cancer: Another Complication of Diabetes Mellitus? American Journal
of Epidemiology 1998, 147(9).
5.
Sun L, Shiying Y. Diabetes Mellitus Is an
Independent Risk Factor for Colorectal Cancer. Digestive Diseases and Sciences,
Springer 2012, 57, 1586-1597.
6.
Coughlin S.S., Calle E.E., Teras T.R., Petrelli
J, Thun M.J. Diabetes Mellitus as a Predictor of Cancer Mortality in a Large Cohort
of US Adults. American Journal of Epidemiology 2004, 159(12).
7.
Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC). Behavioral
Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey Data. Atlanta, Georgia: U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, 2012.
8.
Inadomi J.M., et al.
Adherence to Colorectal Cancer Screening a Randomized Clinical Trial of
Competing Strategies. Arch Intern Med. 2012, 172(7), 575-582.
9.
Green B.B., Wang C.Y.,
Anderson M.L., et al. An automated intervention with stepped increases in
support to increase uptake of colorectal cancer screening; a randomized trial.
Annals of Internal Medicine. 2013, 158(5 pt 1): 301-311.
No comments:
Post a Comment