By Thomas Watson, MD
Nephrology Associates PC
As a nephrologist, I sometimes feel like the annoying little hall monitor who spends his
days at school telling his colleagues what they can't do. Unfortunately, given that the kidneys are
susceptible to so many different insults and that patients with chronic kidney disease are unique
in terms of their specific health needs, I am compelled to embrace that role as the so-called
"kidney safety police." I have decided to use this opportunity to participate in the Birmingham
Medical News Blog as a chance to update medical professionals on some of the most common
issues and recent developments in the world of "kidney safety." Many readers are already familiar
with everything I am about to say, but hopefully, some of the following will lend some clarity:
Antibiotics:
With the ever-increasing
incidence of MRSA seen in the ambulatory setting, we in the
nephrology community
have noticed a much higher usage rate of oral sulfa antibiotics like
trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole
(i.e. Bactrim). These particular antibiotics, while they generally
have very good efficacy
for MRSA, can wreak havoc in patients with chronic kidney disease.
In particular, they can
cause both acute renal failure, and severe hyperkalemia. I encourage
outpatient basis. A much
less common but present antibiotic side effect involves the use of
quinolones, which can
cause interstitial nephritis -- prolonged courses of quinolones in
particular can
uncommonly be a problem in this regard. Besides dosing adjustments that may
be required, other oral
antibiotics are not generally nephrotoxic.
In the inpatient
setting, there remain a number of pitfalls with regards to antibiotics and
kidney function. With
newer antibiotics, and newer/safer formulations of some older antibiotics
(anti-fungals like
amphotericin, for example), there has been, I believe, a decline in
antibiotic-induced acute
renal failure on an inpatient basis. That being said, aminoglycosides
remain predictably
nephrotoxic and should be used sparingly and carefully. The original
amphotericin B should be
avoided in favor of the new liposomal formulations that have a
reduced incidence of
acute renal failure. As always, any penicillin can cause allergic interstitial
nephritis. Daptomycin is
a newer antibiotic that is tolerated well, but still has reports of up to
3% incidence of acute
renal failure. The toxicity of vancomycin remains controversial.
Low
Molecular Weight Heparins (LMWH):
There are two issues
here. First, once daily dosing at a slightly reduced dose for DVT
prophylaxis is widely
accepted in patients with ESRD and in patients with pre-dialysis CKD.
Not so with treatment
doses. There have been no conclusions made regarding the use
of low molecular weight
heparins at treatment doses for patients with CKD or ESRD. Studies
have demonstrated both
an increase in bleeding events (i.e. overdose) and thrombotic events
(i.e. underdosed), even
with the once daily dosing for treatment at 1mg/kg of enoxaparin for
example. Essentially,
these findings demonstrate that we have no idea how best to dose
LMWH in patients with
kidney disease. Some hospitals have made it possible to follow Factor
Xa levels and thus have
a way of monitoring therapeutic efficacy -- in this case, I think the use
of LMWH is probably
safe. The alternative is “the old-fashioned way--” i.e. unfractionated
heparin until the patient
is therapeutic on warfarin.
Oral
Diabetes Medicines:
Metformin:
Most
are aware of the problems with metformin in kidney disease, but I will
clarify: The problem
with metformin is not that it is nephrotoxic (it isn’t). Metformin metabolism
in patients with CKD can
lead to lactic acidosis; sometimes it can be severe and
life-threatening. There
is some controversy in the literature about what threshold to use when
deciding when to stop
metformin. Historically, it has been suggested that a creatinine of 1.5 is
the limit above which no
one should take metformin. Using estimated GFR would provide a
more reliable means, and
I would suggest using a GFR of 30 as the cutoff below which
patients should not take
metformin. If someone has a higher GFR than 30, but has
progressive CKD, I would
stop metformin earlier.
Sitagliptin: This is a newer
diabetes medicine (DPP-IV inhibitor, trade name Januvia)
that should be given at
lower doses for patients with CKD, and has had a few case reports of
actually causing some
kidney damage. Dosing recommendations should be available on the
package insert, via
Epocrates or UpToDate, or in the PDR.
Linagliptin: This is also a DPP-IV
inhibitor (trade name Tradjenta), but it requires no
renal adjustment and has
had no case reports of causing acute renal failure.
Pioglitazone: (trade name Actos)
This medicine has its own non-renal problems,
although it does cause
swelling in some patients. There are no renal issues with this
medicine, but again, its
non-renal problems need to be considered as well.
Other oral diabetes
medicines are well-tolerated in kidney disease (including
sulfonylureas,
meglitinide derivatives, etc), but one should always keep in mind that patients
may require less drug as
kidney disease progresses.
Fenofibrate:
Although an uncommon
complication of triglyceride-lowering therapy, fenofibrate has
been implicated in the
development of kidney damage. I generally take my patients with CKD
off fenofibrate --
unfortunately, palatable triglyceride lowering therapy options are relatively
limited, so I generally
don’t substitute anything. The longterm mortality risk associated with
CKD is higher than that
associated with hypertriglyceridemia.
IV
Contrast:
The risk for acute
contrast nephropathy is present for anyone exposed to CT or
angiography-related
contrast. The risk factors that increase the likelihood of nephropathy
include underlying CKD,
age, diabetes, volume depletion, NSAID use, and type and amount of
contrast used. Many
different agents have been studied as potential prophylactic agents, with
disappointing results in
general. Limiting the volume of contrast appears to be the most
valuable measure
available -- e.g. for cardiac catheterizations, avoiding the unnecessary left
ventriculogram and
considering staged procedures. The only other prophylactic measure with
reliable positive data
is volume expansion, probably with isotonic bicarbonate-based IV fluid
prior to the procedure.
The data for N-acetylcysteine is equivocal at best, but since it is an
inexpensive therapy with
no side effects, it is still widely used (the regimen I use is 1200 mg
twice daily on the day
before and day of the procedure). Other prophylactic measures that
have been tried but are
not effective (and, therefore, not recommended) include dialysis,
hemofiltration, vitamin
C, theophylline, and statins.
Gadolinium has been
associated with a condition called nephrogenic systemic fibrosis
in a small number of
patients with CKD and ESRD. This disease is a diffuse sclerosing illness
that has no obvious
treatment and can sometimes be fatal. Consequently, I do everything I
can to help my CKD and
dialysis patients avoid exposure to gadolinium. There are some
reports that frequent
dialysis immediately after exposure can limit the risk, but it is unclear.
Most of the time, an
alternative to MRI with contrast can be found.
Dabigatran:
The use of Dabigatran
(aka Pradaxa) is not recommended in patients with CKD/ESRD.
PICC
Lines:
The increased use of
peripherally inserted central catheters has been a boon to many
patients who have
difficult venous access or need longterm home IV therapies. Unfortunately,
PICC lines should be
avoided in patients with CKD/ESRD. PICC lines cause permanent
damage to the vein in
which they are inserted, thus making that vein impossible to use for
dialysis access in the
future. I know that considering dialysis “down the road” must not seem
very important when you
have a patient in the hospital who needs access. On the other
hand, we, the
nephrologists, see many patients every year who have limited options for
dialysis access (and
thus, limited options for life), sometimes due to previous use of PICC
lines. So, we avoid PICC
lines as much as possible in patients who have any chance of
needing dialysis in the
future.
By no means is this an
exhaustive list, but these are the most common issues that we
encounter in our
patients. If there is ever a question, a nephrologist is but a phone call away.